I am done now that I have made my point.
Published on March 17, 2007 By frogsleg In Blogging
I have been reading the forums and blogs in this place for a while now and think I have gotten to know some of the regulars here reasonably well, though I have not interacted at all with them

Lets see who do we have on the forums:

Dr Guy - seems a nice guy - tries to stay out of arguments and stay neutral.
Texas Wahine - so far from what i have seen she seems to try to be middle of the road as well but could be accused of being a toadie to little whip, though she tries to stay out of the fray.
BakerStreet - what a moaning minnie, seems to be a bright crayon in the box but is mentally immature. Gets into a fray every so often. A bulldog has nothing on stubborness BakerStreet outstrips the dog. Arrogant.
LittleWhip - what can I say - a nasty crappy piece of work - usually causes the fray.
GideonMacleish - writes for the sake of writing - loves to hear his own voice - the louder the better. Arrogant.
ParaTed2k - tries to remain impatial but occassionally gets toadish, though he does try hard not to be, can be mouthy and uses sarcasm
SanChonino - A toadie - one of Little Whips little puppies, he cannot do or say enough to please her or agree with her, can always be found in the middle of a fray. Child.
MasonM - seems to be nice bloke, has a thing for knitting.
Tova 7 - A toadie one of LittleWhips puppies, as with San Chonino she cannot say something quick enough to agree with Littlewhip.
ForeverSerenity - loves to write about a variety of subjects - seems to be popular but is not above getting into the fray, can be seen in feeding frenzies from time to time.
BlueDev - can be seen in the fray occassionally getting down and dirty, can be a nasty shit.
Moderateman - sick man, much loved.
Col Gene - Not someone I will read, seems to be a bit of a joke among other users.
Cactoblaster - Australian, has been seen in the fray, but rarely gets down and dirty in the fray, mostly remains neutral.
Paladin77-has written some interesting articles.
Adnauseum- lives in Egypt - seems to be a good person, not seen yet by me in a fray.
Locamomma - gets depressed easily, seems to be a bit of a rollercoaster ride in her life.
NickyG-not my type of read, her blogs should stay on her blog they are boring.
Gilford Tuttle - fruit cake.
Dr Donald - neutral
Kelly - tries to remain neutral - sometimes seems to flounder sometimes, get the feeling she can get overwhelmed on JU.
Dynamaso - Australian - seems nice enough.
Shovelheat - pornographic at times
Trudygolightly-seems to be a nice lady and she is a thorn in Littlewhips side and is not afraid to take her on.
Emperoroficecream - does not write often and when he does it is for me very contrived - pretentious, psuedo intellectual, though he does occassionally comeout with some gems of wisdom...I always get the feeling that he is talking with a plum in his mouth when he writes.
Draginol - site owner, entrepenuer, seems to be a bright crayon in the box.

There are too many others to write up, but I feel I have got to know them one by one as they have displayed their personalities on the forums. Some of them are very points conscious. I cannot see the reason for having the points system, I think it is one of the main causes of the fights and bickering on the site, if the points system was done away with a whole lot of arguing would go too.

So now I have joined and started to write my own blog, I wonder how I will fit into this zoo, how soon will it be before I get a flame throwing party, the all time favorite pastime of JU.

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Mar 17, 2007
All right, which old exiled/self-exiled blogger is back under a new name? No need to keep us in suspense until we figure it out . . .
on Mar 17, 2007
All right, which old exiled/self-exiled blogger is back under a new name? No need to keep us in suspense until we figure it out . .


knobheads do not get the answers they are seeking especially when the question has no meaning, so there is no answer to your question.
on Mar 17, 2007
Jealous much? Bite me.
on Mar 17, 2007
Jealous much? Bite me.


No thank you I will not bite you, you are sour.

Jealous much? For what?

You do not like the observations I have made about the regulars on this site? Too bad.
on Mar 17, 2007
Jealous much? Bite me.




I think this is jennifer1 back from the grave to pester us all . . .
on Mar 17, 2007
I think this is jennifer1 back from the grave to pester us all . . .


She was a troll, damn me to death but I will not be her. Keep digging that grave you speak of and guess again for I am not someone who has been registered before. I have visited many times and made comments as a guest in the past, until they changed it all, and so it is that I must register an account and join Dantes Inferno.
on Mar 17, 2007
I think this is jennifer1 back from the grave to pester us all . . .


Yeah sounds like her grapes doesn't it?

Or should I say her SPAM.

Maybe we should introduce her to Tuttle....that's a match made in well, er...
on Mar 17, 2007

BlueDev - can be seen in the fray occassionally getting down and dirty, can be a nasty shit.

Interesting take on things.  I have, on the rare occassion, been nasty, but I have to say, you are the first person to ever characterize me as a "nasty shit".  Interesting to see other's view of things.  Especially since I have posted so little (and certainly haven't been in the middle of anything) in the whole 1 day since you created this account.

on Mar 17, 2007
Yeah, Dev, this is one of the reasons I think this is jennifer1 . . . the only time I've ever seen you be nasty was towards her that one time. Plus - the writing style is just too similar.
on Mar 18, 2007
Yeah, Dev, this is one of the reasons I think this is jennifer1 . . . the only time I've ever seen you be nasty was towards her that one time. Plus - the writing style is just too similar.


Keep guessing San, I did not like the woman either, but she made some good points. I witnessed the incident of which you speak. The regulars on this site just cannot cope with criticism especially when it is something they do not wish to hear.

Maybe we should introduce her to Tuttle


Tuttle, puts more in his pipe than anyone else does and smokes it - strikes me as someone on a constant drug fuelled roller coaster ride.

Speaking of Jennifer1, do you all remember her sheep accusations? Tova you set a fine example of following like one, you agree too quickly and do not produce a thought of your own; can you not think for yourself? Dig deep into that memory and you will find me, a small, inconsequential memory it will be, but the truth you will see.

I have read you all (most of you) and I have watched your screaming and slanging matches with amusement mingled with disgust, but mostly amusement. The majority of regulars on this site are filled with so much self importance they can barely stand under the weight.

Each clawing the other in their race to be noticed or get some attention, sad, desperate creatures begging for approval from those they mostly despise yet still suck upto each day. Try as they may, their masks do slip and a lack of grace display.

Shivering little beings, their insignificance overwhelms them so they build themselves up with falseness and tend toward a gang mentality turning on one they percieve as being weak or down and tearing a strip of flesh off them to feed their own insatiable desire to bolster their own egos, this they do with regularity, drug addicts each and all, trying to satisfy their needs off others.
on Mar 18, 2007
Tova you set a fine example of following like one, you agree too quickly and do not produce a thought of your own; can you not think for yourself?


I have a whole blog of my own thoughts.

But obviously this isn't about me, its about you. You felt slighted in the past. You don't feel included (must be that wonderful personality thing you have going on). You believe you see things others don't.

Whatever.

on Mar 18, 2007
Wow. You've come totally out of left field. What's happened to you recently to bring on this mild hysteria?
on Mar 18, 2007
This list you've made up and your posing as someone else is doing nothing for your self-esteem, Jenn.

You can't think very much of yourself at this point.

How are you going to fix this?
on Mar 18, 2007
Jenn: Sorry, but the evidence is just too overwhelming against you. The writing style is identical, you are pulling out the very same old epithets against other people. All of your "observations" center on people's past interactions with one user: Jennifer_1.

You see, in the 3 years I have been here there are three people to whom I have been anything you could call nasty. Once to Lucas, when I told him to "Shut the hell up". That was the extent of my comment. Once to another user whom I never named specifically. Finally, to Jennifer, the one time I was truly nasty and it was very directed. The fact that ~450 articles with zero flame articles about a specific person = me being a nasty shit can mean only on thing: You are the one person to whom I was truly nasty.

The obsession with other user's and their past interactions with Little-whip again point to you being Jenn. There are few who have obsessed so much about her, and Jenn was one of the principle blog-stalkers. You would only have these comments to say if your focus was solely on past interactions with Jenn's (your) blog.

See, someone who had really been lurking around here for as long as you hint you have been, would actually have balanced and reasonable thoughts regarding the users you have listed. The fact that all your comments focus on these user's interactions with one person, Jenn, is damning.

Honestly, I don't take back any of the nasty things I said about you, so don't expect to see it here. You are disturbingly unstable, and your need to create an account for the sole purpose of flaming other people who have long since moved on is pathetic.

And I ain't even begun to be a real "nasty shit".
on Mar 18, 2007
Oh,

I feel left out. No bones to throw my way frog legs?

QoD
3 Pages1 2 3